![]() ArchiCAD should be widely accepted and an industry standard by now, shouldn't it? Revit in my opinion has created more of a buzz in 5 years, and keeps getting better with every release.īuilding content in ArchiCAD will required learning a programming language called GDL. ![]() It is very intuitive, and is programmed to work how Architects work, because it has Architects developing it.ĪrchiCAD has over 20 years of experience in the 3D CAD/BIM market. ![]() Revit is easy to learn and use, as you have already discovered. AutoCAD DWG compatibility is absolutely essential. Being an Autodesk product assures continued compatibility with other Autodesk software, including AutoCAD, and maybe more in the future. Revit has the financial backing of Autodesk, one of the largest software companies in the industry. If you are on PC's, I'd lean towards Revit. If your office runs Macs, well then maybe ArchiCAD is for you. Some might say that this could slow down the development cycle. It also means the programmers have to do double-duty and make sure the code works the same on both platforms. In some cases, add-ons are good because they allow third party developers to create programs that work woth ArchiCAD, but for the most part Revit is 'complete' out of the box and really hasn't required any outside development.ĪrchicAD is developed to run on both PC's and Macs, which many people like. Will ArchiStair work with ArchiCAD 9, soon to be released?) Rendering in ArchiCAD is done via an add-on. ![]() (ArchiStair is free, but its still an add-on, and thus must keep up with the development cycle. ArchiCAD has an open API, and at least a few 'add-on' programs are needed to make it do some simple things, like stairs. If you follow skisouth's advice and run Revit out of the box, and ArchiCAD out of the box, I think you will find Revit to be superior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |